Civil Appeal

Civil Appeal

An appeal is a judicial examination of the decision of an inferior court, by a superior court i.e. it is the removal of a cause from an inferior court to test the soundness of its decision, done by a superior court. There is no formal definition of an “appeal” under the CPC 1908.

The Civil Procedure Code 1908 provides for appeals under Sections 96 to 112 to be read with Orders 41 to 45 of the Code. We shall discuss appeals under the following heads) along with the general procedure in Appeals:

  1. First Appeals [Section 96-99A and Order 41]
  2. Second Appeals [Section 100-103, 107-108 and Order 43]
  • Orders from which appeal lies[Section 104]
  • Powers of Appellate Courts [Section 107]
  • Appeal to the Supreme Court [Section 109,112 and Order 45]

First Appeals

Section 96(1) provides that an aggrieved party can file an appeal to a superior court
against a decision of a subordinate court either on a question of fact or a question of law
or a question involving a mix of both fact and law.

Note: First appeals can be filed in any court which may or may not be the High Court.

Second Appeals

Second appeals, or appeals arising out of appellate decrees, serve as a legal recourse for parties dissatisfied with the decision of the first appellate court. These appeals are governed by specific provisions and require valid grounds, such as errors of law, substantial questions of general importance, or departure from established legal principles. The purpose of a second appeal is to rectify any legal irregularities or errors that may have occurred during the initial appellate proceedings. The higher court conducts a thorough examination of the case, focusing primarily on questions of law rather than re-evaluating factual evidence.

What are the Grounds for Filing a Civil Appeal?

When considering a civil appeal, it is essential to identify and establish valid grounds for filing. The grounds for a civil appeal typically revolve around legal errors, factual misinterpretation, or procedural irregularities committed by the lower court. Here are the key grounds to consider:

1) Errors of Law:
  • Appellants may appeal a lower court’s decision if they can demonstrate that the court made errors in interpreting or applying the law.
  • This can include misinterpretation of statutes, incorrect application of legal principles, or failure to consider relevant case precedents.
2) Factual Misinterpretation:
  • Appellants can challenge a lower court’s factual findings if they believe the court misinterpreted or disregarded crucial evidence.
  • To succeed on this ground, it is necessary to show that the lower court’s factual determinations were unreasonable, unsupported by the evidence presented, or contrary to the record.
3) Procedural Irregularities:
  • Procedural irregularities during the lower court proceedings can be grounds for a civil appeal.
  • These irregularities may involve violations of due process, failure to follow proper legal procedures, or errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence.
4) Denial of Substantial Justice:
  • In certain cases, appellants may argue that the lower court’s decision resulted in a denial of substantial justice.
  • This ground encompasses situations where the decision, despite adhering to legal technicalities, produced an unjust or inequitable outcome.
5) Errors of Jurisdiction:
  • If the lower court lacked jurisdiction over the case or exceeded its jurisdiction, it can be a valid ground for appeal.
  • Appellants must establish that the lower court’s jurisdictional errors significantly affected the outcome of the case.
Scroll to Top